Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.