Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.