Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
A securitisation trust constituted under the SARFAESI Act and governed by RBI guidelines was treated as a revocable trust, so its income was held taxable in the hands of the Security Receipt holders rather than in the hands of the trust. The trust was also held not assessable as an association of persons, and the rule relating to indeterminate shares was found inapplicable. In the absence of any distinguishing feature or contrary higher precedent, the appellate order was upheld and the Revenue's attempt to tax the trust was rejected.
A securitisation trust constituted under the SARFAESI Act and governed by RBI guidelines was treated as a revocable trust, so its income was held taxable in the hands of the Security Receipt holders rather than in the hands of the trust. The trust was also held not assessable as an association of persons, and the rule relating to indeterminate shares was found inapplicable. In the absence of any distinguishing feature or contrary higher precedent, the appellate order was upheld and the Revenue's attempt to tax the trust was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.