Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A securitisation trust constituted under the SARFAESI Act and governed by RBI guidelines was treated as a revocable trust, so its income was held taxable in the hands of the Security Receipt holders rather than in the hands of the trust. The trust was also held not assessable as an association of persons, and the rule relating to indeterminate shares was found inapplicable. In the absence of any distinguishing feature or contrary higher precedent, the appellate order was upheld and the Revenue's attempt to tax the trust was rejected.
A securitisation trust constituted under the SARFAESI Act and governed by RBI guidelines was treated as a revocable trust, so its income was held taxable in the hands of the Security Receipt holders rather than in the hands of the trust. The trust was also held not assessable as an association of persons, and the rule relating to indeterminate shares was found inapplicable. In the absence of any distinguishing feature or contrary higher precedent, the appellate order was upheld and the Revenue's attempt to tax the trust was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
