Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction for additional employee cost could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was uploaded after the due date, where the assessee had obtained the form in time, attempted upload before the deadline, and the delay arose from technical glitches in the e-filing portal. The form was already on record before the return of income was filed and was available when the return was processed, so the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench rulings and directed the Assessing Officer to admit the form and allow the deduction in accordance with law. The Department's objection based on a later rejection under section 119(2)(b) was not accepted.
Deduction for additional employee cost could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was uploaded after the due date, where the assessee had obtained the form in time, attempted upload before the deadline, and the delay arose from technical glitches in the e-filing portal. The form was already on record before the return of income was filed and was available when the return was processed, so the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench rulings and directed the Assessing Officer to admit the form and allow the deduction in accordance with law. The Department's objection based on a later rejection under section 119(2)(b) was not accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
