Vehicle expense apportionment and agricultural income substantiation: ITAT allowed partial business deduction and deleted the reclassification additio...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5261 to 5280 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.