Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.