Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.