Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Expenditure is disallowable under Explanation 1 to section 37(1) only where it is shown to relate to an offence or an act prohibited by law; because no punitive action had been taken by the competent insurance regulator, the disallowance was deleted. For insurance business income, section 44 with the First Schedule provides a special computation regime that overrides the general computation rules, so section 14A read with Rule 8D does not apply to an insurer. The prior co-ordinate bench view in the assessee's own case was followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
