Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Registrar scrutiny under the NCLT Rules is limited to a ministerial and procedural check for registration defects; it does not extend to deciding legal questions affecting party rights or the maintainability of a company petition. Questions such as whether the petitioning shareholders meet the statutory threshold, or whether exemption from that requirement can be granted, require judicial adjudication by the regular Bench. The Registry therefore acted beyond its competence in treating those issues as scrutiny defects and refusing registration. The petition was to be numbered, objections if any recorded, and the matter placed before the Bench; the refusal to register was quashed and the issue of maintainability remitted for judicial decision.
Registrar scrutiny under the NCLT Rules is limited to a ministerial and procedural check for registration defects; it does not extend to deciding legal questions affecting party rights or the maintainability of a company petition. Questions such as whether the petitioning shareholders meet the statutory threshold, or whether exemption from that requirement can be granted, require judicial adjudication by the regular Bench. The Registry therefore acted beyond its competence in treating those issues as scrutiny defects and refusing registration. The petition was to be numbered, objections if any recorded, and the matter placed before the Bench; the refusal to register was quashed and the issue of maintainability remitted for judicial decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.