Belated Form 10B filing during Covid-19 cannot defeat charitable exemption where genuine hardship warrants condonation and substantial justice prevail...
Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The alleged joint business arrangement, supply transactions and supporting documents were not proved, so the civil money claim failed and the recovery suit was dismissed. The agreement and related documents were found unreliable because the date was inconsistent with the stamp paper purchase, delivery of materials was not established through supporting witnesses, and several connecting documents were treated as fabricated. Testimony already examined and cross-examined could not be wholly eschewed merely because later cross-examination did not occur, and its probative value had to be assessed. In the cheque dishonour matter, the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence restored.
The alleged joint business arrangement, supply transactions and supporting documents were not proved, so the civil money claim failed and the recovery suit was dismissed. The agreement and related documents were found unreliable because the date was inconsistent with the stamp paper purchase, delivery of materials was not established through supporting witnesses, and several connecting documents were treated as fabricated. Testimony already examined and cross-examined could not be wholly eschewed merely because later cross-examination did not occur, and its probative value had to be assessed. In the cheque dishonour matter, the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
