Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The alleged joint business arrangement, supply transactions and supporting documents were not proved, so the civil money claim failed and the recovery suit was dismissed. The agreement and related documents were found unreliable because the date was inconsistent with the stamp paper purchase, delivery of materials was not established through supporting witnesses, and several connecting documents were treated as fabricated. Testimony already examined and cross-examined could not be wholly eschewed merely because later cross-examination did not occur, and its probative value had to be assessed. In the cheque dishonour matter, the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence restored.
The alleged joint business arrangement, supply transactions and supporting documents were not proved, so the civil money claim failed and the recovery suit was dismissed. The agreement and related documents were found unreliable because the date was inconsistent with the stamp paper purchase, delivery of materials was not established through supporting witnesses, and several connecting documents were treated as fabricated. Testimony already examined and cross-examined could not be wholly eschewed merely because later cross-examination did not occur, and its probative value had to be assessed. In the cheque dishonour matter, the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, so the acquittal was set aside and the conviction and sentence restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
