Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Delay in filing the first appeal was condonable because the assessees gave an elaborate explanation and acted on professional advice; substantial justice was preferred over a technical objection, so dismissal solely for delay was unsustainable. The note further states that compensation received by BSNL employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019 is retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption as a capital receipt under section 10(10B), and the claim could not be denied merely because it was not made in the return. The contrary appellate findings were set aside and revised computations, verification, and consequential refund were directed.
Delay in filing the first appeal was condonable because the assessees gave an elaborate explanation and acted on professional advice; substantial justice was preferred over a technical objection, so dismissal solely for delay was unsustainable. The note further states that compensation received by BSNL employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019 is retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption as a capital receipt under section 10(10B), and the claim could not be denied merely because it was not made in the return. The contrary appellate findings were set aside and revised computations, verification, and consequential refund were directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.