Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
HC held that the validity of FERA show-cause notices issued after repeal turned on whether the issuing officer had legal authority under the repeal-and-savings scheme in FEMA. Relying on the earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling in First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. v. R.M. Ramchandani, the Court held that the same officer was not empowered to act as adjudicating officer for notices under the repealed enactment. As no stay of that ruling existed and no distinguishing facts were shown, the notices were found to be without jurisdiction and were quashed.
HC held that the validity of FERA show-cause notices issued after repeal turned on whether the issuing officer had legal authority under the repeal-and-savings scheme in FEMA. Relying on the earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling in First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. v. R.M. Ramchandani, the Court held that the same officer was not empowered to act as adjudicating officer for notices under the repealed enactment. As no stay of that ruling existed and no distinguishing facts were shown, the notices were found to be without jurisdiction and were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.