Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
TDS on Google AdWords payments turned on whether the platform charges were advertising contract payments under Section 194C or fees for technical services under Section 194J. The Tribunal held that fees for technical services require managerial, technical or consultancy services, and a sophisticated automated platform does not by itself create such services. It found Google AdWords to be a self-service system where keyword selection, budgeting and ad content were done by the advertiser, while matching, auction and display operated automatically, with no relevant evidence of direct human intervention. As advertising is specifically covered by Section 194C, the assessee's deduction rate was correct and it was not in default; the demand under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was deleted.
TDS on Google AdWords payments turned on whether the platform charges were advertising contract payments under Section 194C or fees for technical services under Section 194J. The Tribunal held that fees for technical services require managerial, technical or consultancy services, and a sophisticated automated platform does not by itself create such services. It found Google AdWords to be a self-service system where keyword selection, budgeting and ad content were done by the advertiser, while matching, auction and display operated automatically, with no relevant evidence of direct human intervention. As advertising is specifically covered by Section 194C, the assessee's deduction rate was correct and it was not in default; the demand under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
