Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
