Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.