Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
