Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Revision under section 263 is not warranted where the Assessing Officer has made specific enquiries, examined supporting documents, permissions and valuation details, and taken a view on a trust's advance to a specified person. The assessment was therefore not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue merely because the revisional authority wanted a further or different examination. The text further notes that the alleged charitable trust violation did not justify revision because the record showed full and proper enquiry into the transaction, so the revisional order was set aside.
Revision under section 263 is not warranted where the Assessing Officer has made specific enquiries, examined supporting documents, permissions and valuation details, and taken a view on a trust's advance to a specified person. The assessment was therefore not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue merely because the revisional authority wanted a further or different examination. The text further notes that the alleged charitable trust violation did not justify revision because the record showed full and proper enquiry into the transaction, so the revisional order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.