Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 is not warranted where the Assessing Officer has made specific enquiries, examined supporting documents, permissions and valuation details, and taken a view on a trust's advance to a specified person. The assessment was therefore not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue merely because the revisional authority wanted a further or different examination. The text further notes that the alleged charitable trust violation did not justify revision because the record showed full and proper enquiry into the transaction, so the revisional order was set aside.
Revision under section 263 is not warranted where the Assessing Officer has made specific enquiries, examined supporting documents, permissions and valuation details, and taken a view on a trust's advance to a specified person. The assessment was therefore not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue merely because the revisional authority wanted a further or different examination. The text further notes that the alleged charitable trust violation did not justify revision because the record showed full and proper enquiry into the transaction, so the revisional order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.