Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4321 to 4340 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bank-specific tax claims were largely upheld: deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia), tax treatment of unrealised foreign exchange forward contract gains, CSR expenditure, depreciation on ATMs as computers, depreciation on bank investment portfolio and leased assets, deduction for special reserve, accrual of interest on securities, and the inapplicability of minimum alternate tax to banking companies. On exempt income, the Tribunal accepted verification of own funds and recomputation of administrative disallowance for bank investments. Following binding precedent and no material factual change, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the appellate order was sustained on all contested issues.
Bank-specific tax claims were largely upheld: deduction for provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia), tax treatment of unrealised foreign exchange forward contract gains, CSR expenditure, depreciation on ATMs as computers, depreciation on bank investment portfolio and leased assets, deduction for special reserve, accrual of interest on securities, and the inapplicability of minimum alternate tax to banking companies. On exempt income, the Tribunal accepted verification of own funds and recomputation of administrative disallowance for bank investments. Following binding precedent and no material factual change, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the appellate order was sustained on all contested issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.