Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for initial non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was treated as unsustainable where the assessee later furnished replies and documentary evidence during assessment, and the return was accepted under section 143(3) without adverse inference. The assessment order recorded verification of the later compliance and found it tenable, which indicated that the earlier default had been effectively condoned. On the same facts, the same reasoning was applied to the connected matters, and the penalty under section 272A(1)(d) was deleted.
Penalty for initial non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was treated as unsustainable where the assessee later furnished replies and documentary evidence during assessment, and the return was accepted under section 143(3) without adverse inference. The assessment order recorded verification of the later compliance and found it tenable, which indicated that the earlier default had been effectively condoned. On the same facts, the same reasoning was applied to the connected matters, and the penalty under section 272A(1)(d) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.