Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Re-export of illegally imported municipal solid waste under the hazardous waste regime means return to the country of origin, not shipment to a third country, and domestic disposal through cement kilns or waste-to-energy facilities is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and the Basel Convention. The writ challenge to the confiscation and re-export orders failed because the importers had accepted the adverse adjudication findings, paid penalties and did not pursue the available statutory appeal. The Court also held that container freight station and liner detention charges remained payable after adverse adjudication, but non-payment could not be used to retain the waste in India; the authorised carrier had to carry out the re-export.
Re-export of illegally imported municipal solid waste under the hazardous waste regime means return to the country of origin, not shipment to a third country, and domestic disposal through cement kilns or waste-to-energy facilities is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and the Basel Convention. The writ challenge to the confiscation and re-export orders failed because the importers had accepted the adverse adjudication findings, paid penalties and did not pursue the available statutory appeal. The Court also held that container freight station and liner detention charges remained payable after adverse adjudication, but non-payment could not be used to retain the waste in India; the authorised carrier had to carry out the re-export.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
