Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
An Assessing Officer who is bound by earlier remand directions must adjudicate the original show cause notice after granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second show cause notice instead is treated as impermissible overreaching of the prior court order. The note states that the impugned adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on the first show cause notice in compliance with natural justice under Section 75(4).
An Assessing Officer who is bound by earlier remand directions must adjudicate the original show cause notice after granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second show cause notice instead is treated as impermissible overreaching of the prior court order. The note states that the impugned adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on the first show cause notice in compliance with natural justice under Section 75(4).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.