Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Section 80IB(10)(b) requires the eligible housing project to be developed on the specific plot satisfying the minimum one-acre condition. Land forming part of the approved project, including integral common amenities, may be counted, but separate adjoining land used for the assessee's personal residence cannot be clubbed merely because it is contiguous or owned by the assessee. As the project itself stood on about 70 cents and the balance land was not part of the housing project, the statutory requirement was not met and the deduction was denied. The ITAT therefore upheld disallowance under section 80IB(10) and confirmed the lower authorities' orders.
Section 80IB(10)(b) requires the eligible housing project to be developed on the specific plot satisfying the minimum one-acre condition. Land forming part of the approved project, including integral common amenities, may be counted, but separate adjoining land used for the assessee's personal residence cannot be clubbed merely because it is contiguous or owned by the assessee. As the project itself stood on about 70 cents and the balance land was not part of the housing project, the statutory requirement was not met and the deduction was denied. The ITAT therefore upheld disallowance under section 80IB(10) and confirmed the lower authorities' orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.