Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Section 80IB(10)(b) requires the eligible housing project to be developed on the specific plot satisfying the minimum one-acre condition. Land forming part of the approved project, including integral common amenities, may be counted, but separate adjoining land used for the assessee's personal residence cannot be clubbed merely because it is contiguous or owned by the assessee. As the project itself stood on about 70 cents and the balance land was not part of the housing project, the statutory requirement was not met and the deduction was denied. The ITAT therefore upheld disallowance under section 80IB(10) and confirmed the lower authorities' orders.
Section 80IB(10)(b) requires the eligible housing project to be developed on the specific plot satisfying the minimum one-acre condition. Land forming part of the approved project, including integral common amenities, may be counted, but separate adjoining land used for the assessee's personal residence cannot be clubbed merely because it is contiguous or owned by the assessee. As the project itself stood on about 70 cents and the balance land was not part of the housing project, the statutory requirement was not met and the deduction was denied. The ITAT therefore upheld disallowance under section 80IB(10) and confirmed the lower authorities' orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.