Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
ITAT treated the exemption for capital gains invested in purchase of a plot and construction of a residential house as a beneficial provision requiring liberal, purposive construction. It held that once investment in acquisition and construction was established, strict insistence on a completion certificate or full completion within the period was not the sole test, and COVID-19 disruptions justified the delay; substantial compliance was enough, so the disallowance was unjustified and the exemption had to be allowed. On the stamp duty issue, it held that where the variation between purchase price and stamp duty value was below the enhanced 10% tolerance band, the curative amendment applied and the addition could not survive, so it was deleted.
ITAT treated the exemption for capital gains invested in purchase of a plot and construction of a residential house as a beneficial provision requiring liberal, purposive construction. It held that once investment in acquisition and construction was established, strict insistence on a completion certificate or full completion within the period was not the sole test, and COVID-19 disruptions justified the delay; substantial compliance was enough, so the disallowance was unjustified and the exemption had to be allowed. On the stamp duty issue, it held that where the variation between purchase price and stamp duty value was below the enhanced 10% tolerance band, the curative amendment applied and the addition could not survive, so it was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.