Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Carry forward and set off of short-term capital loss depends on compliance with the prescribed time limit for filing the loss return; where the return for AY 2020-21 was filed beyond the due date and no extension or condonation was sought, the Tribunal stated that carry forward stood denied when the return was processed. It further stated that the earlier denial could not be reopened in an appeal for AY 2024-25, so capital gains of that year could not be set off against the carried forward loss. The Tribunal distinguished Kullu Valley Transport Co. on facts and upheld the denial of set off.
Carry forward and set off of short-term capital loss depends on compliance with the prescribed time limit for filing the loss return; where the return for AY 2020-21 was filed beyond the due date and no extension or condonation was sought, the Tribunal stated that carry forward stood denied when the return was processed. It further stated that the earlier denial could not be reopened in an appeal for AY 2024-25, so capital gains of that year could not be set off against the carried forward loss. The Tribunal distinguished Kullu Valley Transport Co. on facts and upheld the denial of set off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.