Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.