Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.