Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Under section 144C(13), the limitation for passing the final assessment order runs from the month in which DRP directions are received. The text states that the directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal and emailed to the AO on 27.06.2024, with delivery established on that date; therefore receipt occurred electronically then, not later on physical delivery. On that basis, the limitation expired on 31.07.2024, and the assessment order passed on 27.08.2024 was time-barred and quashed; the remaining grounds were left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
