Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cu...
Provisional release on security permitted where cash deposit plus bond secures differential duty; classification and treaty benefits referred for deci...
Customs Valuation Rule Sequence must be followed; single-comparator re-determination and penalties set aside without comparability or proof of mis-dec...
Separately Identifiable Services: transportation found to be the essential character, so Cargo Handling classification and extended limitation rejecte...
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that...
Working capital adjustment, comparable selection and trade receivables interest were revisited in transfer pricing, with key additions deleted and remitted.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
