Power to receive documentary evidence upheld; documents referred in complaint may be placed on record without amendment where omission was inadvertent...
Proof of foreign public documents requires originals or certified diplomatic/notarial copies; inspection must occur in-magna presence and cross-examin...
Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below thresh...
Eligibility for exemption depends on strict construction of the product description; reapers without binder are ineligible, but confiscation and penal...
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that...
Working capital adjustment, comparable selection and trade receivables interest were revisited in transfer pricing, with key additions deleted and remitted.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
