Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that...
Working capital adjustment, comparable selection and trade receivables interest were revisited in transfer pricing, with key additions deleted and remitted.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
In transfer pricing comparability, the Tribunal held that working capital differences materially affect TNMM and that the freight forwarding segment required working capital adjustment; it also held that a comparable cannot be excluded merely because its statements do not expressly disclose related party transactions, absent material showing significant related party influence. The TPO was directed to grant the adjustment and include AP Logistics and Dimension Logistics. On corporate overhead charges, ALP could not be set at nil under CUP without benchmarking, so the issue was remitted for fresh examination with evidence. For notional interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal held that a debt-free company with no interest cost did not warrant a separate adjustment, and the addition was deleted for both years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
