Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
A writ petition against a customs show cause notice based on a tariff classification dispute was declined because the controversy required adjudication by the statutory authority, and the recognised exception for interference at the notice stage, such as absence of jurisdiction or abuse of process, was not made out. The petitioner was left to reply to the notice and pursue the statutory process. A separate natural justice challenge based on absence of a pre-consultation hearing was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because there was no specific pleading, and that contention was left open for consideration by the adjudicating authority.
A writ petition against a customs show cause notice based on a tariff classification dispute was declined because the controversy required adjudication by the statutory authority, and the recognised exception for interference at the notice stage, such as absence of jurisdiction or abuse of process, was not made out. The petitioner was left to reply to the notice and pursue the statutory process. A separate natural justice challenge based on absence of a pre-consultation hearing was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because there was no specific pleading, and that contention was left open for consideration by the adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.