Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A liquidator's determination of security interest and distribution entitlements was treated as tentative, because it was read as flowing from an earlier order already under challenge. The Appellate Tribunal held that the statement could not be read in isolation as a final adjudication overriding the pending appeal, and that the observation on paragraph 45 was not conclusive. As the decision itself showed it was subject to the outcome of the pending appellate proceedings, no party could claim a definitive advantage from it at that stage. The appeal was closed subject to this clarification.
A liquidator's determination of security interest and distribution entitlements was treated as tentative, because it was read as flowing from an earlier order already under challenge. The Appellate Tribunal held that the statement could not be read in isolation as a final adjudication overriding the pending appeal, and that the observation on paragraph 45 was not conclusive. As the decision itself showed it was subject to the outcome of the pending appellate proceedings, no party could claim a definitive advantage from it at that stage. The appeal was closed subject to this clarification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.