Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An adjudicatory order must deal with the pleadings and record reasons for accepting or rejecting the reliefs sought; failure to consider the contentions raised and the remaining prayers renders the order non-speaking and vitiated for non-application of mind. As the impugned order granted only part of the relief without addressing the balance claims on merits, it was quashed and the application was remitted for fresh decision, without expressing any view on the underlying merits.
An adjudicatory order must deal with the pleadings and record reasons for accepting or rejecting the reliefs sought; failure to consider the contentions raised and the remaining prayers renders the order non-speaking and vitiated for non-application of mind. As the impugned order granted only part of the relief without addressing the balance claims on merits, it was quashed and the application was remitted for fresh decision, without expressing any view on the underlying merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.