Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax paid under reverse charge may be available where the same transportation service was already taxed in the hands of the service provider, but that entitlement depends on verification of whether double payment actually occurred. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh factual examination of the relevant payments and records. The limitation bar under Section 11B was held inapplicable to refund of tax paid by mistake on an amount not payable by the assessee, so the rejection on limitation was set aside.
Refund of service tax paid under reverse charge may be available where the same transportation service was already taxed in the hands of the service provider, but that entitlement depends on verification of whether double payment actually occurred. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh factual examination of the relevant payments and records. The limitation bar under Section 11B was held inapplicable to refund of tax paid by mistake on an amount not payable by the assessee, so the rejection on limitation was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.