Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
After remand, the Assessing Officer had to adjudicate the original GST show cause notice for the same financial year by granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second notice instead was contrary to the earlier HC directions and amounted to overreaching the court order. The HC did not examine the merits of Section 74 and set aside the adjudication order solely on this procedural ground, remanding the matter for fresh decision on the basis of the first notice after personal hearing and due consideration of the reply.
After remand, the Assessing Officer had to adjudicate the original GST show cause notice for the same financial year by granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second notice instead was contrary to the earlier HC directions and amounted to overreaching the court order. The HC did not examine the merits of Section 74 and set aside the adjudication order solely on this procedural ground, remanding the matter for fresh decision on the basis of the first notice after personal hearing and due consideration of the reply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.