Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
After remand, the Assessing Officer had to adjudicate the original GST show cause notice for the same financial year by granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second notice instead was contrary to the earlier HC directions and amounted to overreaching the court order. The HC did not examine the merits of Section 74 and set aside the adjudication order solely on this procedural ground, remanding the matter for fresh decision on the basis of the first notice after personal hearing and due consideration of the reply.
After remand, the Assessing Officer had to adjudicate the original GST show cause notice for the same financial year by granting personal hearing and considering the reply; issuing a second notice instead was contrary to the earlier HC directions and amounted to overreaching the court order. The HC did not examine the merits of Section 74 and set aside the adjudication order solely on this procedural ground, remanding the matter for fresh decision on the basis of the first notice after personal hearing and due consideration of the reply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.