Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Section 96(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme was held to exclude only assessments made under the specified search provisions under Sections 132 or 132A. Where the department itself recorded that the reassessment under Section 147 was founded on material impounded during survey under Section 133A, and the earlier Section 153C proceedings had been dropped, the exclusion could not be extended by combining the discarded search-based proceedings with the later survey-based reassessment. The exclusion being statutory required strict construction, and no additional restriction could be read in. The rejection of the declarations was illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to acceptance.
Section 96(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme was held to exclude only assessments made under the specified search provisions under Sections 132 or 132A. Where the department itself recorded that the reassessment under Section 147 was founded on material impounded during survey under Section 133A, and the earlier Section 153C proceedings had been dropped, the exclusion could not be extended by combining the discarded search-based proceedings with the later survey-based reassessment. The exclusion being statutory required strict construction, and no additional restriction could be read in. The rejection of the declarations was illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to acceptance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
