Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 96(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme was held to exclude only assessments made under the specified search provisions under Sections 132 or 132A. Where the department itself recorded that the reassessment under Section 147 was founded on material impounded during survey under Section 133A, and the earlier Section 153C proceedings had been dropped, the exclusion could not be extended by combining the discarded search-based proceedings with the later survey-based reassessment. The exclusion being statutory required strict construction, and no additional restriction could be read in. The rejection of the declarations was illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to acceptance.
Section 96(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme was held to exclude only assessments made under the specified search provisions under Sections 132 or 132A. Where the department itself recorded that the reassessment under Section 147 was founded on material impounded during survey under Section 133A, and the earlier Section 153C proceedings had been dropped, the exclusion could not be extended by combining the discarded search-based proceedings with the later survey-based reassessment. The exclusion being statutory required strict construction, and no additional restriction could be read in. The rejection of the declarations was illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to acceptance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.