Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.