Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.