Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
