Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Deduction under 80JJAA could not be denied on limitation where the return of income and Form No. 10DA were filed on 30.11.2018, the due date recorded in the statutory intimation. The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had wrongly assumed the due date under section 139(1) was 31.10.2018, and that assumption led to an erroneous disallowance. As the filing was within the recorded due date, the statutory condition for rejection was not breached. The deduction was held allowable and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.