AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
