Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
