Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
