Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
